Rudderless: The instability of the Industry portfolio is shocking

By James Riley

At a time when the economy is reeling from pandemic-related stress, when geo-strategic tensions have put a premium on building sovereign capability, and when the pace of technological change has accelerated, Australia finds itself without an Industry minister.

In reality, the Industry portfolio has been rudderless for most of the year, ever since Scott Morrison’s extraordinary decision to shift Christian Porter to the role from Attorney-General’s in March, in the wake of historic rape allegations.

Whatever small amount of stability that had been through the tenure of Karen Andrews was demolished by that terrible, terrible decision.

Even though Mrs Andrews was Industry minister for just 18 months, she held the job longer than most of the others that have held the position since the Coalition formed government in 2013.

Angus Taylor is the eighth person to hold ministerial responsibility for Industry. To say again, he will be the EIGHTH person.

It is worth doing the rollcall. Each name will trigger mass eye-rolls at all of the new initiatives, new reports, new reviews, new directions, new “fresh-thinking”, new priorities, new agendas that each new minister has brought with them.

First came Ian Macfarlane (two years). Then Christopher Pyne (nine months). Greg Hunt (six months). Arthur Sinodinos (11 months). Michaelia Cash (eight months). Karen Andrews (18 months). Christian Porter (less than 6 months). And now acting minister Angus Taylor.

Now that’s a conga-line if ever there was one.

So, what are some of the decisions that are sitting on the minister’s desk? Well, we are sitting in lockdown in the middle of a pandemic, so decisions about how to build domestic mRNA manufacturing capability is one thing.

But that’s just one of the hundred other sovereign capability/supply chain issues that the portfolio is supposed to be taking seriously. What about rare earths and critical minerals? What about artificial intelligence, and quantum computing?

Surely it would be helpful to have some consistency in the Industry portfolio to address these massively important areas?

The Industry minister is also the Minister for Science and Technology. Where is Australia placing its bets to make sure that we have a domestic capability in these fundamentally important areas of strategic interest?

Even flagship programs like the Growth Centres are caught in a moment of indecision. The program’s funding will dry-up next year – and yet there is no plan to replace it.

And then there are the submarines. The submarine program is at least as much about Industry and the building of sovereign industrial capability as it is about Defence.

Christian Porter’s rambling justification to the media detailing his rationale for resigning was pathetic.

The instability of the Industry portfolio is a shocking failure of this government, at a time when the nation can least afford instability.

There are many smart and invested people working on the challenges that Australia faces, and many incredible, innovative companies working to build Australian capability. No-one is waiting for this government to get its act together.

But surely they deserve better. Patience is thin.

There was no indication from the Prime Minister on Sunday whether the acting Minister for Industry, Science and Technology Angus Taylor will hold the portfolio all the way until the looming federal election.

If not, then we will be on to Minister Number Nine.

This article originally appear at InnovationAus.

Subscribe to our free @AuManufacturing newsletter here.

Share this Story

Stay Informed

Go to Top